ASG Weekly Reader: Winning the War at Home

More signs this week that the most significant progress being made toward resolving the conflict in Afghanistan is occurring on the home front. While the past week’s headlines reported a record number of civilian casualties in Afghanistan and further evidence of the double-game played by the U.S.’s essential partners in Pakistan, two pieces of good news emerged from the halls of Congress.

First, a letter urging a “sizable and sustained reduction” in U.S. forces beginning in July was delivered to the White House on Tuesday bearing the signatures of 27 senators. Then the House Appropriations Committee unanimously approved an amendment to the 2012 Defense Appropriations bill by Republican Rep. Frank Wolf of Virginia calling for the creation of an Afghanistan-Pakistan Study Group. The independent study group would provide an outside review of the current military strategy and offer recommendations for the future of the U.S. military mission.

Why does the country need an outside review of the current strategy? Because, says Rep. Wolf, “We are 10 years into our nation’s longest running war and the American people and their elected representatives do not have a clear sense of what we are aiming to achieve, why it is necessary, and how far we are from attaining that goal.”

Because Gen. Petraeus’ own staff concluded two months ago that the coalition “still does not fully understand the regenerative capacity of the insurgency.”

And because senior military leaders like Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen told Pres. Obama in November of 2009 that the U.S. would be able to hand over security responsibilities to the Afghan Army in 18 months. Now he says we won’t even have “clarity” on what the way forward looks like until the end of the year.

ARTICLES

6-12-11
Exclusive: Obama’s Secret Afghan Exit

Daily Beast by Leslie H. Gelb

Obama is keeping under wraps a hush-hush plan for withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan—and he hopes it will satisfy those pushing for a quick exit and the diehards determined to stay the course

Ninety Percent of Petraeus’s Captured ‘Taliban’ Were Civilians
IPS by Gareth Porter

The claims of huge numbers of Taliban captured and killed continued through the rest of 2010. In December, Petraeus’s command said a total of 4,100 Taliban rank and file had been captured in the previous six months and 2,000 had been killed. Those figures were critical to creating a new media narrative hailing the success of SOF operations as reversing what had been a losing U.S. strategy in Afghanistan. But it turns out that more than 80 percent of those called captured Taliban fighters were released within days of having been picked up, because they were found to have been innocent civilians, according to official U.S. military data.

6-13-11
Bob Corker Says War in Afghanistan ‘Not Sustainable’
ABC News by Jonathan Karl and Gregory Simmons

“I think all of us who have been in Afghanistan on the ground multiple times know that what we’re doing there on the ground is just not sustainable,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said.

As Local Militias Expand in Northern Afghanistan, Tales of Abuse Follow
NYTimes by Rod Nordland

Untrained local forces like the arbakai, who hope to be accepted and paid as Afghan Local Police, “just create problems,” an international official with knowledge of the A.L.P. program said. “It is still preying on the people, changing one predator for another.”

6-14-11
House panel backs $649 billion in defense spending

Reuters by David Alexander and Susan Cornwell

When Democratic Representative Betty McCollum suggested a measure to force the Pentagon to curb the $100 million it spends annually in race car sponsorships as part of its recruitment campaign, the lawmakers balked. “Perhaps,” one suggested, “she does not understand the cultural relationship of NASCAR (stock car racing) to those of us who live in the South.”

Candidates Show G.O.P. Less United on Goals of War
NY Times by Jeff Zeleny

The hawkish consensus on national security that has dominated Republican foreign policy for the last decade is giving way to a more nuanced view, with some presidential candidates expressing a desire to withdraw from Afghanistan as quickly as possible and suggesting that the United States has overreached in Libya.

6-15-11
Withdrawal From Afghanistan Will Likely Be Slow

The Atlantic

Within the next few weeks, Obama will announce his decision about the pace of the transition. A small interagency review has already finished its work, which will provide the broader context for Petraeus’s recommendations.

6-17-11
Even Rep. Dicks is now calling for ending war in Afghanistan

The News Tribune by Rob Hotakainen

If you need proof that the tide has turned against the war in Afghanistan, Exhibit A is Rep. Norm Dicks of Belfair, the top-ranked House Democrat in charge of the Pentagon’s budget.

U.S. Mayors Announce Call to End Afghanistan War & Invest in Job Creation
Gamut News by Gamut News Staff

The nation’s mayors, led by Conference President and Burnsville, MN Mayor Elizabeth Kautz, will announce the introduction of a resolution, calling to end the Afghanistan War and re-direct spending for job creation this Friday, the beginning of their four-day annual meeting in Baltimore.

Pentagon wants to ‘extend’ Afghanistan surge
AFP

The US military is asking President Barack Obama to maintain its troop surge in Afghanistan until the fall of 2012, a month before a scheduled withdrawal, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday. The timeline would mean the president could promise large troop reductions to a war-weary public just ahead of the November 2012 presidential elections in which he seeks a second term, but military officials told the Journal that the electoral schedule had nothing to do with their proposal.

Report Sees Danger in Local Allies
Wall Street Journal by Dion Nissenbaum

The killings of American soldiers by Afghan troops are turning into a “rapidly growing systemic threat” that could undermine the entire war effort, according to a classified military study.

OPINION

6-14-11
Our Current Strategy in Afghanistan Is Built on Strategic Myths
National Interest by Joshua Rovner

America’s strategy in Afghanistan has become incoherent. Among other problems, it is based on two questionable assumptions which large swaths of the foreign policy community take for granted. Both are wrong.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>